Link

“Unlike a computer, which it essentially is, you don’t have to wait for it to get started. Turn it on and you’re doing something. It’s got wifi and Bluetooth and will be able to make use of 3G on some models, too, so you can be online even when you’re not near a wireless internet connection. That’s a huge plus for aviation use. For the record, though, my netbook will do all those things, too, with the addition of a plug in 3G card.

[…]

For non-aviation use, I’ll probably stick to my netbook–the virtual keypad on the iPad looks awful. But for flying, the iPad sounds like a dream chart reader. It’s going to be quick to turn on, it’s going to have a brilliant display, and it’s going to be supremely easy to use. Charts, especially IFR approach charts, are a natural.”

“Constitutions which aim at the common advantage are correct and just without qualification, whereas those which aim only at the advantage of the rulers are deviant and unjust, because they involve despotic rule which is inappropriate for a community of free persons.”

- Aristotle -

I think we can still find a lot of wisdom in Aristotle’s words, even regarding our beloved technology world. Obviously Aristotle didn’t write anything about tech, but he did for politics and ethics.

I believe that Apple is doing nothing more than applying Aristotle’s concepts to his devices, both the iPhone and the iPad. I read a lot of negative comments about the recently announced iPad and its - again - closed system, but all these people don’t get the main point: a closed system is actually more open and reliable than an already-open one.

Let’s say Apple is the ruler and the iPhone / iPad is the country: with a closed OS (monarchy) Apple doesn’t want anyone else to get in their way of ruling. But clearly, Apple (the ruler) has the interest of his country at heart: it’s a strict type of government, yet focused on what’s best for the country (the device)

Other scenario: the country (iPad) is a democratic one. This means that the citizens (the users) are more directly involved in governing (OS), they can make requests and see them applied. Clearly, they only care about their own interest, they don’t want the best for the country: they just want the best for them.

Apple doesn’t want anyone to get in their way. They provide a closed OS, with strict rules and limitations but pay attention: having rules to follow is always better than having no rules. If you still think that “OS Democracy” is a good thing, please remember that many times in the past democracy deviated into anarchy. No authority means no control, and no control means terrible user experience. On the other hand, you could say that monarchy can deviate in tyranny. That’s true folks, but that’s where trust comes in: do you trust the ruler? Then you have nothing to fear. Can I trust some dude who wants flash on his iPad? Definitely not.

“We want flash” is the new “We want lower taxes”.

Great post over at Cocoa Therapy, discussing what the iPad will actually bring on the table of user interfaces. Must read.

My dear readers, the perfect notes app doesn’t exist. What? You’re surprised? Come on guys, it’s a matter of fact that perfection isn’t part of this world, and as long as we can think about making something good, we’ll only be able to make something great. That’s the human nature. This concept applies to every kind of human creation: art, food, software. So what are we talking about anyway? We just strive to use / create something great, in the best way that’s possible. Back to notes, perfection doesn’t exist there either, greatness does. Well, let’s say that among 3000 notes app available in the App Store, maybe 10 of them are great. Do the math, you get the hang of how life works. But greatness alone isn’t enough: you should add a good dose of personality and usefulness to the mix. A system can be great and admirable, but it couldn’t work for someone. Summing up: I need a great notes app, it has to adapt to my personality and it should be useful. Can you believe I found all of this in Simplenote?

Read more