Posts in Linked

Designed in California Makes Its Official Debut→

Designed in California, the Apple history podcast from Myke Hurley and Jason Snell, is now live on Relay with two new free episodes, plus more for Kickstarter backers and Relay subscribers.

Over the summer, Myke and Jason ran a successful Kickstarter campaign for the new show, which will be released as topical series. The first series about the Apple II was released over the summer as part of a preview for the Kickstarter campaign.

Now, the first two episodes of Apple’s Mac OS Crisis are out and available to listen to for free. Those episodes will be followed by five more weekly installments. However, if you backed the Kickstarter or if sign up to support the show via Relay’s website, you get all seven episodes of the series immediately.

The latest series is about:

Apple’s Mac OS crisis in the ’90s, leading to the company acquiring NeXT and bringing Steve Jobs back.

Apple’s Mac OS Crisis also features special guest John Siracusa, who knows a thing or two about ’90s Apple. In addition to the audio-only version of Designed in California, the show is available on YouTube.

It’s been great to see this show come together over the summer. I know it’s been a lot of work, which is clear from the depth and quality of the episodes. I fully expect Designed in California to become the definitive podcast for Apple history nerds.

Permalink

A Trio of Ternus Tales→

Myke Hurley writing on The Enthusiast covers three themes from John Ternus’ new CEO bio that was updated today on the Apple Leadership page:

Number 2:

John has led much of the company’s focus in areas like reliability and durability, introducing new techniques that have made Apple products remarkably resilient

I would not have predicted this angle being so prominent, so I can only assume it’s something that’s important to Ternus. Ultimately, it’s good for customers too — you want your computers to last. Apple has also made inroads into the repairability of its products, which I feel goes hand in hand with this.

Of the three, this is the most interesting to me. I wouldn’t have expected durability to be so prominent either, but in addition to Apple’s repairability push in recent years that Myke highlights, I think this is Apple telegraphing something about the future of its products.

In a world where memory and storage prices have skyrocketed and show no signs of coming down to Earth anytime soon, durability becomes a differentiator that’s more important than ever. When you combine that with the system-level stability and performance efforts Apple has made across its OSes this year, I expect we’ll be hearing a lot more about the long-term value of Apple’s devices this fall.

Permalink

Inside OpenAI’s Codex with Andrew Ambrosino→

On today’s episode of AppStories, Federico and I interview Andrew Ambrosino, the project lead for Codex. It’s a great conversation that covers a lot of ground, including:

  • the long history and many iterations of Codex,
  • the merging of Codex into a new version of ChatGPT based on web technologies,
  • Computer Use and Computer History, which came along with OpenAI’s acquisition of Sky last year, and
  • what goes into designing for user trust.

Then for AppStories+ subscribers, we dug into Andrew’s Mac origin story and some of his favorite Mac apps.

AppStories is available on Apple Podcasts and all your favorite podcast players, as well as YouTube. AppStories+ is a special ad-free, extended version of AppStories that’s delivered a day early in high-bitrate audio for $5/month or $50/year by itself or as part of a Club MacStories Premier membership that adds our weekly and monthly newsletters, app discounts, and other perks for $12/month or $120/year.

Permalink

Parker Ortolani’s First Impressions of the Pebble Index AI Smart Ring→

Parker Ortolani on the Pebble Index, the recently released AI smart ring:

Ambient computing is here at home on speakers and in the workplace with apps like Wispr Flow, it’s only a matter of time before we carry it with us everywhere.

The Pebble Index is the best preview of that future. The simple gesture of pressing your thumb to your index finger is unbelievably natural. Especially for quick interactions. I’ve found myself setting more reminders, recording ideas, and keeping lists up-to-date. And I know that everything is being logged on my phone in the Pebble app. Better yet, you can connect the Pebble Index to your other AI tools using MCP. There’s also no reason for skeptics to fret, it’s not always listening for hot words or logging everything it hears.

As Ortolani explains, the device ticks a lot of boxes that other AI gadgets just don’t:

The thing that I think strikes me hardest with the Index is that it’s just so socially inoffensive. It’s a form factor people already love, it’s not distracting, it’s not always listening, and it’s affordable. It could be the first truly noncontroversial AI-first hardware.

I ordered a Pebble Index months ago and it should be coming within the next week or so. I bought it for many of the features Ortolani mentions. It’s on-demand, discreet, and a form factor that doesn’t look out of place. The hardware and software matter a lot with a device like this, but if Pebble has nailed it, I can see it becoming my go-to way to jot down brief notes. I’m excited to give it a try and report back.

Permalink

Relay Launches Its 2026 Campaign to Benefit St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital→

Today, Relay kicked off its annual fundraiser for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital to help combat childhood cancer. In the seven years since the fundraiser began, Relay and its dedicated community of listeners have raised over $4.8 million; a truly amazing figure.

We’d love it if readers joined us in supporting this cause again this year. You can make a donation by visiting here.

The Podcastathon is a big part of the annual fundraiser as Myke Hurley explains on The Enthusiast:

Every year, the Podcastathon for St. Jude is a huge part of our fundraising mission, and we’ve decided that this year we want to turn it into a full-on celebration by having the 12-hour event close out our campaign. So this year we’ll be streaming live on Friday, October 2nd, from the campus of St. Jude.

Also, if you’re not familiar with the story behind Relay’s annual St. Jude Fundraiser, be sure to visit 512 Pixels for the details.

Thanks in advance for checking out Relay’s fundraiser for St. Jude and to all who donate.

Permalink

Apple Updates Magic Keyboards→

Source: Apple.

Source: Apple.

Earlier this year, Apple swapped the text on some of its laptop keyboard keys for glyphs. MacRumors reports that the trend has now spread to four of the company’s Magic Keyboard models:

On the new keyboards, the tab, caps lock, shift, return, and delete keycaps are labeled with glyphs rather than edge text.

The keyboards with numeric pads get even more glyphs than the more compact models.

It’s a small change, but I like it. I burn through keyboards pretty fast with the amount of typing I do, and these come just in time to replace the Magic Keyboard on I use with my Mac Studio that has a slowly disappearing “A” key.

Permalink

Defining an “Agent Harness”→

I’ve recently been asked to explain what an “agent harness” is (particularly after I wrote about my favorite app of the year so far, Open Minis). I realized it was one of those concepts I could understand intuitively but not quite articulate. Thankfully, other people have done a better job of explaining it than I have.

Drew Breunig calls them “situated agents”:

Harrison Chase once excitedly shared an insight that agents are comprised of 4 things: a system prompt, a planning tool, a file system, and subagents. In the year-plus since he said that, I think this remains largely true. (Though you might tweak it to have general tools, etc.)

[…]

Imagine the simplest coding agent, and you at the keys. Let’s slowly zoom out and consider all the elements the harness can manage:

  1. The Session: The current task and context, as both a trajectory and a durable, branchable log. You can zoom backwards, fork, and replay it.
  2. The Environment: The instance, defined as a sandbox, terminal, worktree, computer, and/or container.
  3. The Repo: The project. Versioned with Git, it contains your code, history, current work, AGENTS.md, guides, and hooks.
  4. Memory: The person’s predilections, accrued over time, managing progress and past decisions.
  5. Skills: The domain, artifacts describing reusable workflows or domain knowledge worth wielding in this situation.
  6. The Team: Your colleagues and counterparts. Shared rooms, shared traces, project tracking tools, issues, and bug reports.
    • The Organization: The policies and audits, defined by legal, leadership, and procurement.
    • The Model: The LLMs themselves, the common artifact shared by all. Stochastic blobs we all poke trying to evoke positive outcomes. Log or train on their quirks and adjust.

I also thoroughly enjoyed this explanation and excellent visualization by Ted Spare, Dexter Storey, and Sarim Malik, writing for Rubric Labs:

A harness is the software that translates a model into a system that can affect its environment.

[…]

Functionally, a harness makes a model agentic, meaning it can take action.

And:

As coding agents begin to run for longer, and deploy more intelligence through dispatch, they are owning larger and more complex problems end to end, and the developer is less in the loop to steer the agent. The value of high quality planning increases as agents implement the plans more autonomously. Harnesses like Claude Code and Codex ship with a native planning mode, where the agent must first create a detailed Plan.md file with feedback from the user before executing. These harnesses then place a reference to the plan and the todo list into a top level state (system prompt) so that the agent doesn’t forget what it’s working on across long runs.

Given the multi-model, hybrid structure of the new Siri AI, we should probably assume Apple also made a lightweight “Siri harness” to aid the on-device orchestration of the entire system.

Permalink

Apple Music to Launch Labels on AI “Songs”→

Ethan Millman, writing for The Hollywood Reporter:

Apple Music will soon launch labels on songs created with artificial intelligence, the company said in an email sent out to industry partners on Thursday.

In the email, obtained by The Hollywood Reporter, the streaming service said that AI music labels will come “later this year,” though Apple Music didn’t disclose a specific launch date.

The new labels come months after Apple Music launched transparency tags back in March, available for record labels and music distributors to disclose when content uploaded was “materially generated using AI.”

Good. As much as I enjoy working and tinkering with AI, AI “music” falls squarely in the category of AI implementations I do not understand and cannot even be remotely interested in. Perhaps I’m old-fashioned, but what’s the point of listening to “music” performed by something you can’t see live on a stage, or that you know has never lived a real life? (Obviously we can’t see The Beatles or Beethoven perform live today, but we know they were real humans with real motivations behind their work.)

If you ask me, AI music shouldn’t even be allowed on streaming services, but I suppose it’s too late to fix that problem by now. Hopefully Apple will also include a system-level toggle to permanently hide AI “music” from Apple Music’s UI, too.

Permalink

Raising the Gates Is Not the Way to Improve the App Store→

Jeff Johnson has a knack for finding spam on the App Store. Yesterday it was review spam, and today it’s app submission spam. In a post where he called out an individual for releasing 41 apps, and presumably contributing to slow app review times, Johnson proposed a solution:

…bring back Apple Developer Program tiers and review app updates post-release for proven developers. Why should Marco Arment go into the same App Store review queue as AI slop? Does that make any sense for developers, for Apple users, or for Apple? Is there no way for developers to earn Apple’s trust, no matter how long they’ve been in the App Store, no matter how famous or beloved? Should professional software developers whose livelihood depends on the App Store go into the same review queue as hobbyists? Speaking for myself, I would be willing to pay a much higher developer program fee for improved service, including a separate review queue. I suspect that a much higher developer program fee might also deter scams and AI slop, typically looking for a fast, easy buck.

I’ve heard versions of this argument since before the App Store first opened its doors, and it’s never sat well with me. Maybe that’s because when I first heard someone argue that established developers or the ones who could afford it should get preferential treatment, I was an unknown hobbyist learning Objective-C and trying to build an app myself. It struck me as gatekeeping then, and it still does today.

There’s no doubt that there is spam on the App Store, but the way to remove it is to target the spammers, not new developers, students, and hobbyists looking to build their ideas. I know that being an indie developer isn’t an easy way to make a living, but erecting barriers to submitting apps is the surest way to starve Apple platforms of fresh, innovative ideas. That hurts everyone from users who would have fewer choices to the established developers who would find themselves writing apps for a stagnant platform.

Permalink